4.5 Article

Usefulness of anti-oxidized LDL antibody determination for assessment of clinical control in patients with heart failure

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 58-62

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.04.015

Keywords

heart failure; oxidized-LDL; antibodies; Pro-BNP; oxidative stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: It has been suggested that oxidative stress may play a role in the pathogenesis of heart failure, this may have potential implications for therapeutic strategies. However, measures of oxidative stress are subject to confounding inaccuracies. IgG antibodies to oxidized LDL reflect exposure to the lipoprotein over an extended period and may thus mirror oxidative stress over a prolonged time frame. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that anti-oxLDL antibodies correlate with the control of heart failure (HF), as manifested by hospital admissions for cardiac dysfunction. Methods: One hundred and two consecutive patients attending the HF clinic with either systolic or diastolic HF were enrolled and the quality of clinical control was evaluated by assessing hospital admissions over the year prior to index determination of the oxidative stress marker. Antibodies to oxLDL were determined by ELISA and pro-BNP levels were also measured. Results: Most patients (mean age 71.5 years) had systolic HF; mean NYHA functional class was 2.7 and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 39.7%. Anti-oxLDL antibodies, but not pro-BNP, correlated significantly with mean NYHA score (averaged from all clinic visits in the year prior to blood testing), and with hospital admissions over the year prior to blood testing. Mean IgG anti-oxLDL antibody levels in patients with hospital admissions were 3.4 times higher than those in subjects not hospitalized over the previous year. Conclusion: IgG anti-oxLDL antibody levels correlate with the severity of HF. (c) 2005 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available