4.3 Article

A prospective open-label study of glatiramer acetate: over a decade of continuous use in multiple sclerosis patients

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 309-320

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1191/135248506ms1318oa

Keywords

disability; disease modifying therapy; EDSS; glatiramer acetate; immunomodulator; relapse; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Funding

  1. FDA HHS [FD-40005559-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A decade of continuous glatiramer acetate (GA) use by relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients was evaluated in this ongoing, prospective study, and the neurological status of 'Withdrawn' patients was assessed at a 10-year long-term follow-up (LTFU) visit. Modified intention-to-treat (mITT, n = 232) patients received >= 1 GA dose since 1991; 'Ongoing' patients (n = 108) continued in November 2003. Of 124 patients, 50 Withdrawn patients returned for LTFU. Patients were evaluated every six months (EDSS). Mean GA exposure was 6.99, 10.1 and 4.26 years for mITT, Ongoing, and Withdrawn/LTFU patients, respectively. While on GA, mITT relapse rates declined from 1.18/year prestudy to similar to 1 relapse/5 years; median time to >= 1 EDSS point increase was 8.8 years; mean EDSS change was 0.73 +/- 1.66 points; 58% had stable/improved EDSS scores; and 24, 11 and 3% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. For Ongoing patients, EDSS increased 0.50 +/- 1.65; 62% were stable/improved; and 24, 8 and 1% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. For Withdrawn patients at 10-year LTFU, EDSS increased 2.24 +/- 1.86; 28% were stable/improved; and 68, 50 and 10% reached EDSS 4, 6 and 8, respectively. While on GA nearly all patients (mean disease duration 15 years) remained ambulatory. At LTFU, Withdrawn patients had greater disability than Ongoing patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available