4.2 Article

Characterization of biliary intra-epithelial lymphocytes at different anatomical levels of intrahepatic bile ducts under normal and pathological conditions: Numbers of CD4(+)CD28(-) intra-epithelial lymphocytes are increased in primary biliary cirrhosis

Journal

PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 17-24

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2006.01913.x

Keywords

biliary epithelial cells; CD4(+)CD28(-) cell; innate immunity; intra-epithelial lymphocytes; intrahepatic biliary tree

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Distribution of intra-epithelial lymphocytes along intrahepatic biliary tree (bIEL), and their density and phenotype were examined in normal and diseased livers, particularly in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Immunohistochemically, bIEL were examined in 28 normal livers, 13 cases of chronic viral hepatitis (CVH), 13 cases of PBC, five cases of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), seven cases of extrahepatic biliary obstruction (EBO), and 16 hepatolithiatic livers. In normal livers, bIEL were relatively dense at large and septal bile ducts compared to interlobular ducts. Most of them were positive for CD3 and CD8, while a few were positive for CD4, CD20 and CD57. In CVH, PSC and EBO, neither distribution, phenotype nor density of bIEL differed from normal liver. In hepatolithiasis, numbers of CD8(+)bIEL were increased in stone-containing ducts. In PBC, numbers of CD4(+)CD28(-)bIEL, which are reportedly responsible for target tissue destruction in autoimmune diseases, were markedly increased in damaged interlobular ducts. In conclusion, CD3(+)CD8(+)bIEL may be involved in immune homeostasis of intrahepatic bile ducts in normal livers and in CVH, PSC and EBO. Altered distribution and phenotypes of bIEL in PBC and hepatolithiasis may reflect their participation in biliary lesions. Increased CD4(+)CD28(-)bIEL in damaged bile ducts of PBC may be related to immune-mediated biliary damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available