4.3 Article

Analytical and graphical determination of the trajectory of a fireball using seismic data

Journal

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 78-86

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2005.08.003

Keywords

fireball; trajectory; seismic; shock waves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we discuss two methods, one analytical and the other graphical, to determine the trajectory of a fireball using the arrival times of atmospheric shock waves recorded by a seismic network. In the analytical method the trajectory and the raypaths are assumed to be straight and we solve for the fireball velocity, the azimuth (rho) and elevation angle (delta) of the trajectory, the coordinates of the intersection of the trajectory with the earth's surface, and the corresponding intersection time (t(0)). Because the problem is nonlinear, we solve it iteratively. The fireball velocity cannot be determined uniquely, and trades off with t(0). The graphical method is based on the drawing of contours of arrival times, which should be elliptical for fireball shock waves. If the distribution of seismic stations is appropriate, the horizontal projection of the fireball is given by the axis of symmetry of the contours, which allows the estimation of rho, while delta can be estimated from the spacing between contours along the symmetry axis. Application of the two methods to data from four fireballs shows that the graphically derived parameters can be within a few degrees of the analytical parameters. In addition, a fireball recorded in the Czech Republic has reliable trajectory parameters derived from video recordings, which allows an independent assessment of the quality of the parameters determined analytically. In particular, rho and delta have errors of 1.7 degrees and 1.3 degrees, respectively, which are not particularly large considering that the station distribution was not favorable. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available