4.2 Article

Alcohol relapse repetition, gender, and predictive validity

Journal

JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 349-353

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.03.004

Keywords

alcohol; relapse; relapse precipitants

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON ALCOHOL ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM [R21AA012302] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAAA NIH HHS [R21 AA12302, AA281-91-0007] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earlier exploratory work on a scoring algorithm for the Reasons for Drinking Questionnaire [Zywiak, W. H., Westerberg, V S., Connors, G. J., & Maisto, S. A. (2003). Exploratory findings from the Reasons for Drinking Questionnaire. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 25, 287-292.] presented a number of interesting findings, but was limited by a fairly low consistency in type of relapse between the first relapse and the second relapse (63%). This scoring algorithm objectively classifies alcohol relapses into one of three types (negative affect, social pressure, or craving/cued). While examining gender differences in the type of first relapse, evidence indicating that relapses were more consistent for men (81%) than for women (44%) was uncovered. For initial posttreatment relapses, women were more likely to have negative affect relapses, and men were more likely to have social pressure relapses. For men, negative affect relapses were predicted by the Beck Depression Inventory score. For women, negative affect relapses were predicted by the Alcohol Dependence Scale score, and craving/cued relapses were predicted by situational craving. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available