4.4 Article

Adhesion analysis of two-level hierarchical morphology in natural attachment systems for 'smart adhesion'

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages 1475-1491

Publisher

VSP BV
DOI: 10.1163/156856106778666408

Keywords

gecko; adhesion; hierarchical structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The attachment ability of insects and lizards is well known. The Tokay gecko, in particular, has the most complex adhesion structures. The pads are covered by a large number of small hairs (setae) that contain many branches per seta with spatulae. Seta branch morphology is hierarchical. Hierarchical morphology of setae is responsible for adaptation of a large number of spatulae to rough surfaces. Van der Waals attraction between the large numbers of spatulae in contact with a rough surface is the primary mechanism for high adhesion. In order to investigate the effect of hierarchical structure, for the first time, the two-level hierarchical model has been developed. We consider one- and two-level hierarchically structured spring models for simulation of setae contacting with random rough surfaces and demonstrate the effect of the two-level hierarchical structure on the adhesion force, the number of contacts and the adhesion energy. Tip of spatula in a single contact was assumed as spherical. Rough surfaces with various roughness parameters which cover a common range of most of natural and artificial rough surfaces at the scale of gecko's pad were generated. It was found that significant adhesion enhancements are created with the two-level structure until a certain value of roughness which appears to be related to the maximum spring deformation. We conclude that the hierarchical morphology of a gecko seta is the necessary part for 'smart adhesion' of gecko, the ability to cling on and detach from different smooth, as well as rough surfaces.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available