4.4 Article

Design and evaluation in vitro of controlled release mucoadhesive tablets containing chlorhexidine

Journal

DRUG DEVELOPMENT AND INDUSTRIAL PHARMACY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 53-61

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03639040500388300

Keywords

mucoadhesive tablets; buccal chlorhexidine controlled release; methocel; carbopol; local action/permeation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This investigation deals with the development of buccal tablets containing chlorhexidine (CHX), a bis-bis-guanide with antimicrobial and antiseptic effects in the oral cavity, and able to adhere to the buccal mucosa to give local controlled release of drug. A mucoadhesive formulation was designed to swell and form a gel adhering to the mucosa and controlling the drug release into the oral cavity. Some batches of tablets were developed by direct compression, containing different amounts of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and carbomer; changing the amount ratio of these excipients in formulations, it is possible easily modulate the mucoadhesive effect and release of drug. The in vitro tests were performed using the USP 26/NF paddle apparatus, a specifically developed apparatus, and a modified Franz diffusion cells apparatus. This last method allows a simultaneous study of drug release rate from the tablets and drug permeation through the buccal mucosa. Similar tests have also been carried out on a commercial product, Corsodyl gel trademark , in order to compare the drug release control of gel with respect to that of the mucoadhesive tablet, as a formulation for buccal delivery of CHX. While the commercial formulation does not appear to control the release, the formulation containing 15% w/w methocel behaves the best, ensuring the most rapid and complete release of the drug, together with a negligible absorption of the active agent as required for a local antiseptic action in the oral cavity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available