4.3 Article

Dynamic mapping of normal human hippocampal development

Journal

HIPPOCAMPUS
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages 664-672

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20193

Keywords

hippocampus; subregions; hippocampal mapping technique; MRI; developmental trajectories

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR13642, R21 RR019771, U54 RR021813] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG016570] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [R21 EB01651] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R25 MH060482] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R21RR019771, U54RR021813, P41RR013642] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R25MH060482, Z01MH002794, Z01MH002581, Z01MH002240] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG016570] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hippocampus, which plays an important role in memory functions and emotional responses, has distinct subregions subserving different functions. Because the volume and shape of the hippocampus are altered in many neuropsychiatric disorders, it is important to understand the trajectory of normal hippocampal development. We present the first dynamic maps to reveal the anatomical sequence of normal human hippocampal development. A novel hippocampal mapping technique was applied to a database of prospectively obtained brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (100 scans in 31 children and adolescents), scanned every 2 yr for, 6-10 yr between ages 4 and 25. Our results establish that the structural development of the human hippocampus is remarkably heterogeneous, with significant differences between posterior (increase over time) and anterior (loss over time) subregions. These distinct developmental trajectories of hippocampal subregions may parallel differences in their functional development. Published 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available