4.5 Article

Management of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in children using tacrolimus

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 544-551

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000097864

Keywords

nephrotic syndrome; steroid-resistant FSGS, children; steroid-resistant FSGS, management; tacrolimus treatment in children; children, steroid resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The use of tacrolimus in steroid-resistant (SR) focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) has been reported in single and small series case reports. Aim: To determine the efficacy of tacrolimus in the management of SR FSGS in children. Study Design: This was a prospective study of 20 children with SR FSGS treated with tacrolimus (0.2-0.4 mg/kg/day in two divided doses over 12 h adjusted to a trough level between 7 and 15 ng/ml) for 12 months in combination with low-dose steroids. Other therapies included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, folic acid, multivitamins and lipid-lowering agents. Results: The mean age at study entry was 11.1 years (range 5.6-16.8). The mean duration of nephrotic syndrome before initiation of tacrolimus therapy was 4.7 years (range 2.1-7.6). At the end of the treatment period, 8 (40%) children were in complete remission, 9 (45%) were in partial remission, and 3 (15%) failed to respond. The average follow-up period following cessation of tacrolimus treatment was 27.5 months (range 13.7-43.7). At last hospital follow-up, 5 (25%) children were in complete remission, 10 (50%) in partial remission, and 2 (10%) in relapse. Three children died from dialysis-related complications following cessation of tacrolimus treatment. Adverse events included sepsis (2), nausea (2), diarrhea (2), anemia (4) and worsening of hypertension (4). Conclusion: Tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for SR FSGS. However, like cyclosporine, some children tend to relapse following cessation of treatment. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available