3.8 Article

Recruitment and participation in clinical trials: Socio-demographic, rural/urban, and health care access predictors

Journal

CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 24-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.12.001

Keywords

clinical trial; cancer disparities; patient selection; research participant recruitment; patient participation; rural or urban population; minority groups; neoplasm; knowledge; attitudes; source of information

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1UO1CA86249-01, U01 CA086249, U01 CA086249-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [P60 MD000532-01, P60 MD000532-02, P60 MD000532, P60MD000532] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA086249] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES [P60MD000532] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recruitment and participation in clinical trials by minorities, particularly African Americans and rural underserved populations, are low. This report examines predictors of clinical trial recruitment and participation for adult Marylanders. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to survey 5154 adults (18 years and older) residing in 13 of the 24 jurisdictions in Maryland, including urban Baltimore City, and the rural regions of Western Maryland and the Eastern Shore. The survey, conducted between December 2001 and March 2003. used Computer-Assisted Telephone Interviewing and random-digit dialing procedures. Primary dependent variables included ever asked to participate (i.e., recruited) and participated in clinical trials. Results: 11.1% of the respondents had been recruited to clinical trials. In addition, 59.4% of the respondents recruited to clinical trials actually participated in a clinical trial. Among respondents recruited to clinical trials. black and middle income respondents were significantly less likely to actually participate in clinical trials whereas, respondents who received information about clinical trials from their health care provider, who were knowledgeable about clinical trials, and those who had the time commitment were significantly more likely to participate in clinical trials. Conclusions: These results suggest serious gaps in efforts to recruit racial/ethnic minorities and residents Of rural regions into clinical trials. The findings provide the basis for the development and implementation of community-based educational programs for both the general public and health care professionals, and to enhance availability of community-based clinical trials, especially in the rural areas of the state. (c) 2006 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available