3.8 Review

Acute infections as a means of cancer prevention: Opposing effects to chronic infections?

Journal

CANCER DETECTION AND PREVENTION
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 83-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.11.001

Keywords

fever; cancer prevention; infection; leukocytes; spontaneous regression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Epidemiological studies have found an inverse association between acute infections and cancer development. In this paper, we review the evidence examining this potentially antagonistic relationship. Methods: In addition to a review of the historical literature, we examined the recent epidemiological evidence on the relationship between acute infections and subsequent cancer development in adult life. We also discuss the impact of chronic infections oil tumor development and the influence of the immune system in this process. Results: Exposures to febrile infectious childhood diseases were associated with subsequently reduced risks for melanoma, ovary, and multiple cancers combined, significant in the latter two groups. Epidemiological studies oil common acute infections in adults and subsequent cancer development found these infections to be associated with reduced risks for meningioma, glioma, melanoma and multiple cancers combined, significantly for the latter three groups. Overall, risk reduction increased with the frequency of infections, with febrile infections affording the greatest protection. In contrast to acute infections, chronic infections call be viewed as resulting from a failed immune response and an increasing number have been associated with an elevated cancer risk. Conclusion: Infections may play a paradoxical role in cancer development with chronic infections often being tumorigenic and acute infections being antagonistic to cancer. (c) 2006 International Society for Preventive Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available