4.8 Article

Metabolic Associations of Reduced Proliferation and Oxidative Stress in Advanced Breast Cancer

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 22, Pages 5712-5720

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2215

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Edmond J. Safra bioinformatics program
  2. Dan David foundation
  3. Israeli Centers of Research Excellence (I-CORE), Gene Regulation in Complex Human Disease Center [41/11]
  4. Israeli Science Foundation (ISF)
  5. Israeli Cancer Research Fund (ICRF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aberrant metabolism is a hallmark of cancer, but whole metabolomic flux measurements remain scarce. To bridge this gap, we developed a novel metabolic phenotypic analysis (MPA) method that infers metabolic phenotypes based on the integration of transcriptomics or proteomics data within a human genome-scale metabolic model. MPA was applied to conduct the first genome-scale study of breast cancer metabolism based on the gene expression of a large cohort of clinical samples. The modeling correctly predicted cell lines' growth rates, tumor lipid levels, and amino acid biomarkers, outperforming extant metabolic modeling methods. Experimental validation was obtained in vitro. The analysis revealed a subtype-independent go or grow dichotomy in breast cancer, where proliferation rates decrease as tumors evolve metastatic capability. MPA also identified a stoichiometric tradeoff that links the observed reduction in proliferation rates to the growing need to detoxify reactive oxygen species. Finally, a fundamental stoichiometric tradeoff between serine and glutamine metabolism was found, presenting a novel hallmark of estrogen receptor (ER)(+) versus ER+ tumor metabolism. Together, our findings greatly extend insights into core metabolic aberrations and their impact in breast cancer. Cancer Res; 72 (22); 5712-20. (c) 2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available