4.8 Article

Hedgehog and Notch Signaling Regulate Self-Renewal of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages 1013-1022

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2531

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ontario Institute of Cancer Research
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Like many solid tumors, sarcomas are heterogeneous and include a small fraction of the so-called side population (SP) cells with stem-like tumor-initiating potential. Here, we report that SP cells from a soft tissue tumor of enigmatic origin termed undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (also known as malignant fibrous histiocytoma or MFH sarcoma) display activation of both the Hedgehog and Notch pathways. Blockade to these pathways in murine xenograft models, this human cancer decreased the proportion of SP cells present and suppressed tumor self-renewal, as illustrated by the striking inability of xenograft tumors subjected to pathway blockade to be serially transplanted to new hosts. In contrast, conventional chemotherapies increased the proportion of SP cells present in tumor xenografts and did not affect their ability to be serially transplanted. SP cells from these tumors displayed an unexpectedly high proliferation rate which was selectively inhibited by Hedgehog and Notch blockade compared with conventional chemotherapies. Together, our findings deepen the concept that Hedgehog and Notch signaling are fundamental drivers of tumor self-renewal, acting in a small population of tumor-initiating cells present in tumors. Furthermore, our results suggest not only novel treatment strategies for deadly recurrent unresectable forms of this soft tumor subtype, but also potential insights into its etiology which has been historically controversial. Cancer Res; 72(4); 1013-22. (C) 2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available