4.3 Article

Environmental correlates of species and genetic richness in lungless salamanders (family Plethodontidae)

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2005.07.008

Keywords

species richness; genetic richness; energy; habitat heterogeneity; salamanders

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological diversity is distributed across the planet in non-random, organised ways. At the species level, numerous environmental variables and habitat heterogeneity receiving the most empirical have been proposed to explain this non-random distribution with available enu support. With regard to genetic organisation, environmental stress and habitat heterogeneity have been widely supported. However, few studies have addressed if these two scales of biological organisation are structured via similar processes. Here, we tested whether or not the distributional organisation of genetic and species richness were driven by similar environmental variables for salamanders of the family Plethodonfidae across North America. In general, We found that those environmental variables related to energy, particularly energy made accessible to salamanders via the actions of available moisture, were the primary determinants of both genetic and species richness. This finding is consistent with both the more individuals hypothesis of species richness and neutral-theory expectations for genetic richness. Additionally, greater habitat heterogeneity, as measured by increased topographic variance, Was of secondary importance in positively influencing species richness, although its effects on genetic richness were far more variable. In total. our results suggest that both of these scales of biological organisation are influenced by similar environmental variables, even though increased genetic richness at the population-level does not always translate into greater species richness. (c) 2005 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available