4.7 Review

An overview of evidence for a causal relationship between dietary availability of choline during development and cognitive function in offspring

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 30, Issue 5, Pages 696-712

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.12.003

Keywords

choline; cognition; learning; memory; perinatal; acetylcholine; cholinergic; development; rats; brain; neurology; rodent studies

Funding

  1. NCCIH NIH HHS [K05 AT001323-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [P60-MD00222] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [K05AT001323] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER ON MINORITY HEALTH AND HEALTH DISPARITIES [P60MD000222] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review is part of a series intended for non-specialists that will provide an overview of evidence for causal relationships between micronutrient deficiencies and brain function. Here, we review 34 studies in rodents linking the availability of choline during gestation and perinatal development to neurological function or performance of offspring in cognitive and behavioral tests. Experimental designs, major results, and statistical criteria are summarized in Tables 1-4. Based on our reading of the literature, the evidence suggests that choline supplementation during development results in improved performance of offspring in cognitive or behavioral tests, and in changes in a variety of neurological functional indicators: (1) enhanced performance was observed, particularly on more difficult tasks; (2) increases (choline supplementation) or decreases (choline deficiency) were observed in electrophysiological responsiveness and size of neurons in offspring; and (3) supplementation resulted in some protection against adverse effects of several neurotoxic agents (including alcohol) in offspring. Discussion topics include methodological issues, such as the importance of independent replication, causal criteria, and uncertainties in interpreting test results. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available