4.5 Article

Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects

Journal

COGNITION
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 223-243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010

Keywords

manipulation knowledge; perceptual vs. functional knowledge; sensory/motor experiences; lexical-semantic representation

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [DC00314] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH62566-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH062566] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC000314] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two experiments investigated sensory/motor-based functional knowledge of man-made objects: manipulation features associated with the actual usage of objects. In Experiment 1, a series of primetarget pairs was presented auditorily, and participants were asked to make a lexical decision on the target word. Participants made a significantly faster decision about the target word (e.g. 'typewriter') following a related prime that shared manipulation features with the target (e.g. 'piano') than an unrelated prime (e.g. Wanket'). In Experiment 2, participants' eye movements were monitored when they viewed a visual display on a computer screen while listening to a concurrent auditory input. Participants were instructed to simply identify the auditory input and touch the corresponding object on the computer display. Participants fixated an object picture (e.g. typewriter) related to a target word (e.g. 'piano') significantly more often than an unrelated object picture (e.g. bucket) as well as a visually matched control (e.g. couch). Results of the two experiments suggest that manipulation knowledge of words is retrieved without conscious effort and that manipulation knowledge constitutes a part of the lexical-semantic representation of objects. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available