4.7 Article

Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: Multivariate results from the Pew surveys

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages 8-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032

Keywords

health care quality; access and evaluation [N05]; information services [L01.453]; internet [L01.700.568.080.110.500]; medical informatics [L01.700]; online health information; social sciences [F04.096.879]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides results from seven major nationally representative datasets (two in detail) from the Pew Internet and American Life Project to answer two primary questions: (1) what influences people to seek online health information and (2) what influences their perceived outcomes from having access to this information? Cross-tabulations, logistic regressions, and multidimensional scaling are applied to these survey datasets. The strongest and most consistent influences on ever, or more frequently, using the Internet to search for health information were sex (female), employment (not fulltime), engaging in more other Internet activities, more specific health reasons (diagnosed with new health problem, ongoing medical condition, prescribed new medication or treatment), and helping another deal with health issues. Internet health seeking is consistently similar to general Internet activities such as email, news, weather, and sometimes hobbies. A variety of outcomes from or positive assessments of searching for Internet health information are predicted most strongly by sex (female), engaging in other Internet activities, Internet health information seeking including more frequent health seeking, more specific health reasons, belonging to an online support group sharing health interests, and helping another deal with an illness or major health condition. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available