4.7 Review

Differential aging of the brain: Patterns, cognitive correlates and modifiers

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 730-748

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.07.001

Keywords

MRI; brain; cognitive aging; longitudinal; volumetric; white matter; vascular risk; hypertension

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-11230, R37 AG011230, R01 AG011230, R00 AG036848] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG011230, R37AG011230, R00AG036848] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deciphering the secret of successful aging depends on understanding the patterns and biological underpinnings of cognitive and behavioral changes throughout adulthood. That task is inseparable from comprehending the workings of the brain, the physical substrate of behavior. In this review, we summarize the extant literature on age-related differences and changes in brain structure, including postmortem and noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Among the latter, we survey the evidence from volumetry, diffusion-tensor imaging, and evaluations of white matter hyperintensities (WMH). Further, we review the attempts to elucidate the mechanisms of age-related structural changes by measuring metabolic markers of aging through magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). We discuss the putative links between the pattern of brain aging and the pattern of cognitive decline and stability. We then present examples of activities and conditions (hypertension, hormone deficiency, aerobic fitness) that may influence the course of normal aging in a positive or negative fashion. Lastly, we speculate on several proposed mechanisms of differential brain aging, including neurotransmitter systems, stress and corticosteroids, microvascular changes, calcium homeostasis, and demyelination. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available