4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Mitochondria-targeted peptide antioxidants: Novel neuroprotective agents

Journal

AAPS JOURNAL
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages E521-E531

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1208/aapsj080362

Keywords

reactive oxygen species; mitochondrial permeability transition; apoptosis; necrosis; Parkinson's disease; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Funding

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [P01 DA08924] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS48295] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS048295] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [P01DA008924] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress play a crucial role in the majority of neurodegenerative diseases. Mitochondria are a major source of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and are particularly vulnerable to oxidative stress. Oxidative damage to mitochondria has been shown to impair mitochondrial function and lead to cell death via apoptosis and necrosis. Because dysfunctional mitochondria will produce more ROS, a feed-forward loop is set up whereby ROS-mediated oxidative damage to mitochondria favors more ROS generation, resulting in a vicious cycle. It is now appreciated that reduction of mitochondrial oxidative stress may prevent or slow down the progression of these neurodegenerative disorders. However, if mitochondria are the major source of intracellular ROS and mitochondria are most vulnerable to oxidative damage, then it would be ideal to deliver the antioxidant therapy to mitochondria. This review will summarize the development of a novel class of mitochondria-targeted antioxidants that can protect mitochondria against oxidative stress and prevent neuronal cell death in animal models of stroke, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available