4.7 Review

The evolving theory of basal forebrain functional - anatomical 'macrosystems'

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 148-172

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.003

Keywords

reticular formation; dopamine; acetylcholine; dopaminergic; cholinergic; adaptive response; behavior

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS023805] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-23805] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conceptual basis and continuing development of Alheid and Heimer's [Alheid, G.F., Heimer, L., 1988. New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid and corticopetal components of substantia innominata. Neuroscience 27, 1-39] theory of basal forebrain organization based on the description of basal forebrain functional-anatomical 'macrosytems' is reviewed. It is posed that the macrosystem theory leads to a hypothesis that different macrosystems cooperate and compete to exert distinct influences on motor and cognitive function. Emergent corollaries include, e.g. that the organization of the outputs of different macrosystems should differ. Consistent with these considerations, extant literature and some unpublished data indicate that the input nuclei of rnacrosystems are not abundantly interconnected and macrosystems systems have distinct neuroanatomical relationships with basal forebrain and brainstem cholinergic and dopaminergic ascending modulatory systems. Furthermore, macrosystem outputs appear to be directed almost exclusively at the reticular formation or structures intimately associated with it. The relative merits of the theory of functional-anatomical macrosystems are discussed in relation to Swanson's model of cerebral hemisphere control of motivated behavior. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available