4.7 Review

Tests of quantum chromo dynamics at e(+)e(-) colliders

Journal

REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 1771-1846

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/6/R04

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current status of tests of the theory of strong interactions, quantum chromo dynamics (QCD), with data from hadron production in e(+)e(-) annihilation experiments is reviewed. The LEP experiments ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL have published many analyses with data recorded on the Z(0) resonance at root s = 91.2 GeV and above to root s > 200 GeV. There are also results from SLD at root s= 91.2 GeV and from reanalysis of data recorded by the JADE experiment at 14 <= root s <= 44 GeV. The results of studies of jet and event shape observables, particle production and quark gluon jet differences are compared with predictions by perturbative QCD calculations. Determinations of the strong coupling constant alpha(S)(m(Z0)) from jet and event shape observables, scaling violation and fragmentation functions (FFs), inclusive observables from Z(0) decays, hadronic tau decays and hadron production in low-energy e(+)e(-) annihilation are discussed. Updates of the measurements are performed where new data or improved calculations have become available. The best value of aS( mZ0) is obtained from an average of measurements using inclusive observables calculated in NNLO QCD: alpha(S)(M-Z0) = 0.1211 +/- 0.0021, where the error is dominated by theoretical systematic uncertainties. The other measurements of alpha(S)(m(Z0)) are in good agreement with this value. Finally, investigations of the gauge structure of QCD are summarized and the best values for the colour factors are determined: C-A = 2.89 +/- 0.21 C-F = 1.30 +/- 0.09 with errors dominated by systematic uncertainties and in good agreement with the expectation from QCD with the SU(3) gauge symmetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available