3.8 Article

Tracking the development of serum biochemical parameters in two laying hen strains - a comparative study

Journal

ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages 593-606

Publisher

ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT
DOI: 10.5194/aab-49-593-2006

Keywords

laying hen; Leghorn; medium heavy body; serum metabolites; enzymes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A follow-up, comparative study was designed for the description of differences between two divergent laying hen strains, a Leghorn type and a medium heavy body (MHB) genotype (Hy-Line Brown), in chemical body composition and serum biochemical parameters determined at 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18, 20, 25, 30, 52 and 72 weeks of age: each time 5 birds of both genotypes were analysed and exterminated for body composition analysis. Resulting from the genotype-associated differences, the bodyweight of the populations differed from week 20 oil. In the chemical body composition dry matter content was similar, while crude protein was higher oil weeks I 8 10, mid after 18 weeks in the Leghorns. Crude fat content was higher in the brown birds (weeks 8, 10, 25, 30). Total serum protein and albumin showed slightly increasing trends, while serum creatinine concentration showed a downward trend in both genotypes, the MHB birds having higher values. Triglyceride concentration showed a drastic step-tip at 17 weeks by changing to the pre-layer diet, Coupled with marked between-genotype differences. This quick increase was matched by concentration drops in total and HDL cholesterol, the serum HDL cholesterol of Leghorns being always lower. Sodium concentration showed an increasing tendency with body DM content (R-2=0.914, P < 0.001, n=115). The Leghorns tended to show minimally higher Ca concentrations. The gamma-GT activity was always higher in MHB birds, indicating a less effective hepatic adaptation to the peak production. Applying discriminant analysis to classify the genotypes, 94.4% of the original grouped cases was correctly classified, using all variables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available