4.5 Article

Annual plant-shrub interactions along an aridity gradient

Journal

BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 268-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.baae.2005.08.003

Keywords

annuals; shrubs; desert; Mediterranean; facilitation; competition; environmental gradient; climatic gradient; life stage; rainfall

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Annual plants in semi-arid and and areas are often closely associated with shrubs. The degree of association largely depends on the balance of negative and positive effects between these contrasting plant life-forms, ranging from interference to facilitation. Since positive interactions are predicted to become less important with increasing rainfall, the interaction balance is expected to shift along aridity gradients. However, this prediction has not been tested on a community level. and for different life-history stages across large geographical gradients. Here, we show such changes for annual plant populations and communities in four contrasting sites along a steep climatic gradient, ranging from the and desert to mesic Mediterranean regions in Israel.. Above-ground productivity, richness, seedling density, and seed bank density of the annual plant community, as well as fecundity of annual plant populations, were generally higher under shrubs than in areas between shrubs at the and end of the gradient, but significantly lower at the humid end. Net effects of shrubs on annuals expressed as relative interaction intensity indicated a steady and consistent shift from net positive or neutral effects in the desert to net negative effects in the mesic part of the gradient. These findings emphasize the usefulness of studies along large-scale gradients encompassing a wide range of environmental conditions for understanding community level interactions among coexisting species. (c) 2005 Gesellschaft fur Okologie. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available