4.4 Article

Influence of platelet-rich plasma on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and ectopic bone formation in calcium phosphate ceramics

Journal

CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
Volume 183, Issue 2, Pages 68-79

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000095511

Keywords

bone; tissue engineering; calcium phosphate ceramic; mesenchymal stem cell; platelet-rich plasma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) contains a mixture of growth factors that play an important role in wound and fracture healing. While PRP enhanced bone formation by autogenous cancellous bone grafts, its influence in combination with different bone substitutes remained unknown. This study evaluated the effect of PRP on osteogenic differentiation and ectopic bone formation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in distinct resorbable calcium phosphate ceramics. Calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) blocks with a large specific surface area (48 m(2)/g) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) with a low specific surface area (< 0.5 m(2)/g) were loaded with 2 x 10(5) bone marrow-derived MSC. Half of the specimens were treated with 5-fold concentrated PRP. Biocomposites were implanted subcutaneously into SCID mice or kept under osteogenic culture conditions for 2 weeks before implantation. The addition of PRP increased the specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity (p = 0.012) in undifferentiated MSC/CDHA composites but not in MSC/beta-TCP composites. Osteogenic preinduction was ineffective for CDHA and reduced ALP activity of beta-TCP composites significantly at explantation. Ectopic bone formation was stronger in MSC/CDHA (7/32) compared to MSC/beta-TCP (2/30) composites, but no influence of PRP was evident. In conclusion, the effect of PRP depended on the type of ceramic and the differentiation status of the MSC, and enhanced ALP activity of MSC on the high surface scaffold CDHA only, but PRP did not improve osteogenesis in our setting. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available