4.4 Article

Toll-like receptors and atherosclerosis - Key contributors in disease and health?

Journal

IMMUNOLOGIC RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages 193-209

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/IR:34:3:193

Keywords

toll-like receptors; innate immunity; mice; inflammation; atherosclerosis; antagonistic pleiotropy

Categories

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [T32HL007195, R01HL035297] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL007195, HL035297] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The identification of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) as key pattern-recognition receptors of innate immunity has opened inquiries into previously unknown disease mechanisms. The ability of TLRs to detect a spectrum of pathogen-derived molecules defines their importance in innate immunity and provides a mechanistic link between infection and disease. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease where immune and metabolic factors interact to initiate and propagate arterial lesions. An understanding of TLRs in atherosclerosis could clarify the etiology of this complex process. Furthermore, the existence of host-derived endogenous TLR ligands may implicate TLR involvement in disease mechanisms beyond innate immunity, such as a role in homeostatic mechanisms to resolve injury. Our current knowledge of TLRs in atherosclerosis is discussed in this review with emphasis on experimental studies in atherosclerosis-susceptible mouse models. Highlights from studies of TLR involvement in other disease processes have demonstrated that TLR-dependent mechanisms probably parallel those found in atherosclerosis, some of which could be important in mitigating atherosclerotic injury. Finally, an appreciation of the pro- and anti-atherosclerotic mechanisms of TLR activation over the entire lifetime of an organism will provide clues to the role of TLRs in both health and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available