4.7 Review

Automated protein function prediction - the genomic challenge

Journal

BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 225-242

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbl004

Keywords

computational function prediction; genomic annotation; gene ontology, phylogenomics

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P01GM063208] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [1P01-GM63208] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overwhelmed with genomic data, biologists are facing the first big post-genomic question-what do all genes do? First, not only is the volume of pure sequence and structure data growing, but its diversity is growing as well, leading to a disproportionate growth in the number of uncharacterized gene products. Consequently, established methods of gene and protein annotation, such as homology-based transfer, are annotating less data and in many cases are amplifying existing erroneous annotation. Second, there is a need for a functional annotation which is standardized and machine readable so that function prediction programs could be incorporated into larger workflows. This is problematic due to the subjective and contextual definition of protein function. Third, there is a need to assess the quality of function predictors. Again, the subjectivity of the term 'function' and the various aspects of biological function make this a challenging effort. This article briefly outlines the history of automated protein function prediction and surveys the latest innovations in all three topics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available