4.5 Article

Evaluation of Bone Tissue Response to a Sealer Containing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 62-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.019

Keywords

Biocompatibility; endodontic sealers; endodontics; MTA Fillapex; root canal filling

Funding

  1. CAPES
  2. Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul [2012-7327]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: This study analyzed bone tissue reactions to MTA Fillapex (Angelus lndustria de Produtos Odontologicos Ltda, Londrina, Brazil) compared with an epoxy resin based material in the femur of Wistar rats. Methods: Bone tissue reactions were evaluated in 15 animals after 7, 30, and 90 days (n = 5 per period). Three surgical cavities were prepared on the femur and filled with 0.2 mL MTA Fillapex, AH Plus (Dentsply De-Trey GmbH, Konstanz, Germany), or no sealer (negative control). By the end of each experimental period, 5 animals were randomly euthanized. The samples were histologically processed and analyzed using a light microscope. The presence of inflammatory cells, fibers, and hard tissue barrier formation was evaluated. Differences among the groups and between the 3 experimental periods were evaluated by using 2-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test (P <= .05). Results: MTA Fillapex scored significantly higher for neutrophils at 7 days than at 90. At 7 days, the same occurred when comparing MTA Fillapex with AH Plus. The presence of lymphocytes/plasmocytes significantly decreased over time in all groups. Macrophages, giant cells, eosinophils, and fiber condensation presented no differences among groups and periods. Within 90 days, all groups presented complete hard tissue barrier formation. Conclusions: The presence of mineral trioxide aggregate in MTA Fillapex composition did not improve the bone tissue repair. The presence of sealers provided the re-establishment of the original bone tissue structure and the inflammatory response decreased over time, so they can be considered biocompatible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available