3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

E-customers' third party complaining and complimenting behavior

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/09564230610656999

Keywords

customer satisfaction; complaints; electronic commerce; consumer behaviour

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - To provide an initial framework for online third party complaining and complimenting behavior as a consequence of online product or customer service failure or success, using a third party consumer evaluation web site. Design/methodology/approach - Based on critical incidents supplied by consumers in a third party consumer forum web site, a clear picture of the type and frequency of online service failures and successes is expected to develop using critical incident technique and scientific text analyzing methods for qualitative analysis. Findings - The speed of shipping, shipping materials or packaging and customer service appear to be critical for the online transaction to be a success. Ease of ordering was shown to influence the likelihood of complimenting the most. The results provided support for the existence of bivalent satisfiers, monovalent satisfiers and monovalent dissatisfiers within the online retail environment. Research limitations/implications - Text analyzer has certain software limitations that should be considered. While searching for word patterns, it is possible for the software to use one of several clustering methods, which may be open to subjective interpretation to some extent. The quantitative portion of the study was also limited by the four attribute categories that were used by the online third party web site. Practical implications - The results provide very practical information and impartial advice for online retailers to improve their service by managing reputation in third party consumer evaluations. Originality/value - Provides an initial step towards understanding the nature of online store third party complimenting and complaining behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available