4.3 Article

Ugandan Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus phylogeny: Evidence for cross-ethnic transmission of viral subtypes

Journal

INTERVIROLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages 133-143

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000089374

Keywords

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; Ugandan diversity; viral phylogeny; ethnicity

Categories

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [T37 TW000067-07] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA84122] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [5G12 RR03060] Funding Source: Medline
  4. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [T37TW000067] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [G12RR003060] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aim of this study was to test the relationship between Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) phylogeny and host ethnicity at the within-country scale. Methods: KSHV genomic DNA samples were isolated from 31 patients across eleven Ugandan ethnic groups. Amino acid sequences of the ORF-K1 gene were used to construct a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree. Results: A5 and B1 variants predominated with no evidence of distinct ethnic or geographic distribution. A new K1 subtype ( F) was identified in a member of the Bantu Gisu tribe and a new subtype B variant (B3) among members of the Bantu Ganda tribe. Conclusions: The phylogeny may yet be structured by host ethnicity if members of Ugandan groups have convoluted biological origins, even as they identify with single tribes. An alternative possibility is that KSHV subtype evolution may have preceded major diversification of sub-Saharan Africans into ethnicities as we know them today, with ethnic groups beginning their histories already hosting multiple subtypes. A third alternative is that horizontal transmission of multiple KSHV subtypes may have broken up vertical lineages of the virus passed down within Ugandan populations. Copyright (C) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available