4.8 Article

Arsenic Trioxide Treatment Decreases the Oxygen Consumption Rate of Tumor Cells and Radiosensitizes Solid Tumors

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 482-490

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1755

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS)
  2. Televie
  3. Fonds Joseph Maisin
  4. Saint-Luc Foundation
  5. Actions de Recherches Concertees-Communaute Francaise de Belgique-ARC [09/14-020]
  6. Pole d'attraction Interuniversitaire PAI VI [P6/38]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) is an effective therapeutic against acute promyelocytic leukemia and certain solid tumors. Because As2O3 inhibits mitochondrial respiration in leukemia cells, we hypothesized that As2O3 might enhance the radiosensitivity of solid tumors by increasing tumor oxygenation [partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2))] via a decrease in oxygen consumption. Two murine models of radioresistant hypoxic cancer were used to study the effects of As2O3. We measured pO(2) and the oxygen consumption rate in vivo by electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry and (19)fluorine-MRI relaxometry. Tumor perfusion was assessed by Patent blue staining. In both models, As2O3 inhibited mitochondrial respiration, leading to a rapid increase in pO(2). The decrease in oxygen consumption could be explained by an observed decrease in glutathione in As2O3-treated cells, as this could increase intracellular reactive oxygen species that can disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential. When tumors were irradiated during periods of As2O3-induced augmented oxygenation, radiosensitivity increased by 2.2-fold compared with control mice. Notably, this effect was abolished when temporarily clamped tumors were irradiated. Together, our findings show that As2O3 acutely increases oxygen consumption and radiosensitizes tumors, providing a new rationale for clinical investigations of As2O3 in irradiation protocols to treat solid tumors. Cancer Res; 72(2); 482-90. (C)2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available