4.8 Article

CD24 Offers a Therapeutic Target for Control of Bladder Cancer Metastasis Based on a Requirement for Lung Colonization

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 71, Issue 11, Pages 3802-3811

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0519

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [CA143971, CA009109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metastasis is lethal in most bladder cancer patients. Expression of CD24, a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)linked sialoglycoprotein and cancer stem cell marker, is associated with metastatic progression in multiple cancer types, yet the role of CD24 in this process remains unclear. While developing a murine model of human metastatic bladder cancer, we observed that tumor cell CD24 expression correlated with a propensity to metastasize to the lung. Our immunohistochemical evaluation of 60 paired primary and metastatic human bladder cancer samples revealed increased intensity (P < 0.001) and frequency (P < 0.001) of CD24 expression in metastases. To directly evaluate the role of CD24 in metastatic colonization, we manipulated CD24 expression in human bladder cancer cell lines using short hairpin RNA depletion, cDNA overexpression, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting selection. Although suppression of CD24 reduced acute tumor cell retention in the lungs of mice inoculated intravenously with cancer cells, this differential retention was no longer apparent after 24 hours, prompting us to evaluate the role of CD24 in lung colonization. Here, CD24 was found necessary for subsequent development of lung metastases. We next treated clinically detectable lung metastases in mice with anti-CD24 antibody and observed reduced tumor growth and prolonged survival. These findings suggest that CD24 is a lynchpin of metastatic progression and a promising therapeutic target for antimetastatic therapy. Cancer Res; 71(11); 3802-11. (C)2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available