4.8 Article

Bortezomib mediates antiangiogenesis in multiple myeloma via direct and indirect effects on endothelial cells

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 184-191

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1195

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [IP30 CA10070] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P0-1 78378, R0-1 50947] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone marrow angiogenesis plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression in multiple myeloma. Recent studies have shown that proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Velcade, formerly PS-341) can overcome conventional drug resistance in vitro and in vivo; however, its antiangiogenic activity in the bone marrow milieu has not yet been defined. In the present study, we examined the effects of bortezomib on the angiogenic phenotype of multiple myeloma patient-derived endothelial cells (MMEC). At clinically achievable concentrations, bortezomib inhibited the proliferation of MMECs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells in a dose-dependent and time-dependent manner. In functional assays of angiogenesis, including chemotaxis, adhesion to fibronectin, capillary formation on Matrigel, and chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane assay, bortezomib induced a dose-dependcnt inhibition of angiogenesis. Importantly, binding of MM.1S cells to MMECs triggered multiple myeloma cell proliferation, which was also abrogated by bortezomib in a dose-dependent fashion. Bortezomib triggered a dose-dependent inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) secretion by the MMECs, and reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed drug-related down-regulation of VEGF, IL-6, insulin-like growth factor-I, Angio-poietin 1 (Ang1),and Ang2 transcription. These data, therefore, delineate the mechanisms of the antiangiogenic effects of bortezomib on multiple myeloma cells in the bone marrow milieu.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available