3.8 Article

RPE association with lactate and heart rate during high-intensity interval cycling

Journal

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 167-172

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000180359.98241.a2

Keywords

lactic acid; perceived exertion; training; performance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Physiological and perceptual measures during interval exercise are not well understood. The current study therefore examined the correspondence between RPE, HR, and blood lactate concentration ([La]) during interval cycling. Methods: VO2peak and the 4.0 mmol(.)L(-1) lactate threshold were determined. In session 2, Subjects (N = 12) warmed up (10 min, 0 W) and completed five 2-min intervals (INT) at > 4 mmol(.)L(-1) workload, each separated by 3 min of recovery (REC) (60 rpm, 0 W). HR, RPE, and [La] were recorded at 10 min, at the Conclusion of each INT. and each REC and 5- and 10-min recovery. Results: Repeated-measures ANOVA showed [La], HR, and RPE increased significantly across time (INT and REC). At each time point, repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare standardized data (alpha = 0.05). RPE (at INT) intensified concurrently with HR and [La] at INT. Correlations were significant for INT (P <= 0.05) (HR-RPE: r = 0.63, [La]-RPE: r = 0.43). Similarly, RPE and HR for REC systematically increased with [La]. Correlations for REC were also significant (HR-RPE: r = 0.44, [La]-RPE: r = 0.34). Correlations were also significant for INT and REC combined (HR-RPE: r = 0.70, [La]-RPE: r = 0.22). Conclusions: INT and REC independently showed moderate correspondence for RPE-[La] and RPE-HR. However, tighter overall coupling of HR with RPE (vs [La] with RPE) and a dissociation between RPE-[La] suggest RPE during intervals of intense cycling were more sensitive to acute metabolic demand (evidenced by HR) versus [La].

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available