4.6 Article

Spectral energy distributions of a large sample of BL Lacertae objects

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 445, Issue 2, Pages 441-U72

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053316

Keywords

galaxies : active; BL Lacertae objects : general; radiation mechanisms : non-thermal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have collected a large amount of multifrequency data for objects in the Metsahovi Radio Observatory BL Lacertae sample and computed their spectral energy distributions ( SED) in the log v - log vF - representation. This is the first time the SEDs of BL Lacs have been studied with a sample of over 300 objects. The synchrotron components of the SEDs were fitted with a parabolic function to determine the synchrotron peak frequency,v(peak). We checked the dependence between luminosities at several frequency bands and synchrotron peak frequency to test the blazar sequence scenario, which states that the source luminosity depends on the location of the synchrotron peak. We also calculated broad band spectral indices and plotted them against each other and v(peak). The range of v(peak) in our study was considerably extended compared to previous studies. There were 22 objects for which log v(peak) > 19. The data shows that at 5 GHz, 37 GHz, and 5500 angstrom, there is negative correlation between luminosity and v(peak), whereas in X-rays the correlation turns slightly positive. There is no significant correlation between source luminosity at synchrotron peak and v(peak). Several low radio luminosity-low energy peaked BL Lacs were found. The negative correlation between broad band spectral indices and v(peak) is also significant, although there is substantial scatter. Therefore we find that neither alpha(rx) nor alpha(ro) can be used to determine the synchrotron peak of BL Lacs. On the grounds of our results, we conclude that the blazar sequence scenario is not valid. In all our results, the BL Lac population is continuous with no hint of the bimodality of the first BL Lac samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available