4.7 Article

Snoring is not relieved by nasal surgery despite improvement in nasal resistance

Journal

CHEST
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages 81-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1378/chest.129.1.81

Keywords

nasal obstruction; polysomnography; rhinomanometry; sleep apnea; snoring; surgery; treatment outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: In the present study, we evaluated the effect of nasal surgery oil snoring time, snoring intensity, and sleep-disordered breathing. The role of abnormal cephalometry in treatment outcome was assessed. Design: A cross-sectional prospective study. Setting: University teaching hospital. Patients: Forty consecutive snoring men who were referred to ENT Hospital because of a snoring problem or suspicion of sleep apnea. Interventions: The patients underwent interior rhinomanometry and polysmnography (PSG) with recording of snoring before and after operative treatment of nasal obstruction. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before surgery. Results: Nasal resistance decreased significantly in the overall patient group. Snoring time, snoring intensity, nocturnal breathing, and sleep architecture did not change after nasal surgery. Cephalometry did not predict operative outcome in these patients. Snoring intensity, was found to be significantly higher during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep than during rapid eye movement sleep. Conclusions: Operative treatment of mainly structural nasal obstruction did not seem to decrease snoring intensity, snoring time, or sleep-disordered breathing in all objective assessment by PSG performed after surgery. The effect of treating inflammatory nasal changes during nocturnal breathing, as well as the role of cephalometry in the prediction of treatment outcome will need further evaluation. Higher snoring intensity related to NREM sleep may add to the sleep disturbance of a bed partner in the evening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available