4.6 Review

Cytomegalovirus disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.03.005

Keywords

cytomegalovirus; herpesviruses; human immunodeficiency virus; diagnosis; opportunistic infections; HAART

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytornegalovirus (CMV) infection was one of the most important opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients before the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), i.e. the combination of at least three antiretroviral drugs of different classes. Thereafter, life expectancy and quality of life increased dramatically with the persistent suppression of HIV viremia and a significant reduction in incidence of CMV disease. Nevertheless, evidence for a multitude of direct and indirect effects of CMV on HIV progression is accumulating. Even in the era of HAART, a considerable number of HIV-infected patients have a CD4 cell count below <100mm(-3), which involves a high risk for CMV disease. The focus of the present review is on interpretation of test results, their predictive value for CMV disease, and guidance for the rational use of diagnostic assays in HIV-infected patients. Identification of patients at immediate risk for CMV disease may be accomplished by detection of CMV-DNA in leucocytes or plasma. Evidence is growing that CMV genotypes may be also relevant for the risk of CMV disease. Diagnosis of CMV disease requires in most instances demonstration of virus in biopsy specimen from the affected organ because presence of CMV in blood may not be causally related to symptoms observed. Clinical symptoms and patient characteristics are essential in the interpretation of laboratory test results and may guide the rational collection of clinical specimen and use of laboratory assays. As a consequence, a reliable diagnosis of CMV disease and early identification of patients at high risk for CMV disease requires an integrated interpretation of clinical and virological information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available