4.6 Article

Effect of low doses of corticosteroids in septic shock patients with or without early acute respiratory distress syndrome

Journal

CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 22-30

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194723.78632.62

Keywords

acute respiratory distress syndrome; adrenal insufficiency; clinical trial; cytokines; septic shock; corticosteroids

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We investigated the efficacy of low doses of corticosteroids in septic shock patients with or without early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by post hoc analysis of a previously completed clinical trial. Design: Retrospective analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial of low doses of corticosteroids in septic shock. Patients: Among the 300 septic shock patients enrolled, we selected those meeting standard criteria for ARDS at inclusion. Interventions: Seven-day treatment with 50 mg of hydrocortisone every 6 hrs and 50 mu g of 9-alpha-fludrocortisone once a day. Measurements and Main Results: There were 177 patients with ARDS (placebo, n = 92; corticosteroids, n = 85) including 129 (placebo, n = 67; corticosteroids, n = 62) nonresponders and 48 (placebo, n = 25; corticosteroids, n = 23) responders. In nonresponders, there were 50 deaths (75%) in the placebo group and 33 deaths (53%) in the steroid group (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.89, p = .013; relative risk 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.94, p = .011). The number of days alive and off the ventilator was 2.6 +/- 6.6 in the placebo group and 5.7 +/- 8.6 in the steroid group (p = .006). There was no significant difference between groups in responders. There was no significant difference between groups in the two subsets of patients without ARDS. Adverse events rates were similar in the two groups. Conclusions; This post hoc analysis shows that a 7-day treatment with low doses of corticosteroids was associated with better outcomes in septic shock-associated early ARDS nonresponders, but not in responders and not in septic shock patients without ARDS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available