4.7 Article

Hyperglycemia after SAH - Predictors, associated complications, and impact on outcome

Journal

STROKE
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 199-203

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000194960.73883.0f

Keywords

hyperglycemia; outcome; subarachnoid hemorrhage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose - Hyperglycemia is common after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The extent to which prolonged hyperglycemia contributes to in-hospital complications and poor outcome after SAH is unknown. Methods - We studied an inception cohort of 281 SAH patients with an initial serum glucose level obtained within 3 days of SAH onset and who had at least 7 daily glucose measurements between SAH days 0 and 10. We defined mean glucose burden (GB) as the average peak daily glucose level > 5.8 mmol/L (10(5) mg/dL). Hospital complications were recorded prospectively, and 3-month outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin scale. Results - The median GB was 1.8 mmol/L (33 mg/dL). Predictors of high-GB included age >= 54 years, Hunt and Hess grade III-V, poor Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE)-2 physiological subscores, and a history of diabetes mellitus (all P <= 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, GB was associated with increased intensive care unit length of stay (P = 0.003) and the following complications: congestive heart failure, respiratory failure, pneumonia, and brain stem compression from herniation (all P < 0.05). After adjusting for Hunt-Hess grade, aneurysm size, and age, GB was an independent predictor of death (odds ratio, 1.10 per mmol/L; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.21; P = 0.027) and death or severe disability (modified Rankin scale score of 4 to 6; odds ratio, 1.17 per mmol/L; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.28, P < 0.001). Conclusions - Hyperglycemia after SAH is associated with serious hospital complications, increased intensive care unit length of stay, and an increased risk of death or severe disability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available