4.7 Article

Tryptophan metabolism and oxidative stress in patients with chronic brain injury

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 30-42

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01220.x

Keywords

brain injury; 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid; 3-hydroxykynurenine; kynurenic acid; kynurenine; neopterin; oxidative stress; peroxidation; quinolinic acid; S100B; tryptophan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The kynurenine pathway generates the excitotoxic N-methyl-(D)-aspartate receptor agonist, quinolinic acid and the glutamate antagonist, kynurenic acid, as well as free-radical generators. We investigated the status of the pathway following severe brain injury sustained at least 1 year previously in 15 patients compared with controls. At baseline, patients with brain injury showed increased levels of neopterin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein and peroxidation products in the blood compared with controls, indicating persistent inflammation and oxidative stress. At baseline and following tryptophan depletion, more tryptophan was converted to kynurenine in patients than controls, but less kynurenine was converted into the neuroprotectant, kynurenic acid. This suggests that neuroprotection by kynurenic acid may be inadequate in brain-damaged patients even many years after injury. On tryptophan loading, patients metabolized more kynurenine into kynurenic acid than controls, a process which may be neuroprotective. In addition, lower levels of 3-hydroxykynurenine and 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid in patients after tryptophan loading should be protective since these compounds generate free radicals. The results suggest that for brain-damaged patients, increased activation of the kynurenine pathway, oxidative stress and raised levels of inflammation continue many years after the original insult, possibly contributing to the continuing cerebral dysfunction in these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available