4.8 Article

Use of Four Biomarkers to Evaluate the Risk of Breast Cancer Subtypes in the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages 575-587

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3460

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute for Child Health and Human Development [NO1-HD-3-3175]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA48780]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and National Cancer Institute, NIH, through Emory University [N01-HD-3-3168]
  4. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center [N01-HD-2-3166]
  5. Karmanos Cancer Institute at Wayne State University [N01-HD-3-3174]
  6. University of Pennsylvania [NO1-HD-3-3276]
  7. University of Southern California [N01-HD-3-3175]
  8. Interagency Agreement with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Y01-HD-7022]
  9. California Department of Health Services [103885]
  10. [N01-PC-67006 (Atlanta)]
  11. [N01-CN-65064 (Detroit)]
  12. [N01-PC-67010 (LA)]
  13. [N01-CN-0532 (Seattle)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epidemiologic studies suggest that some hormone-related risk factors in breast cancer differentially influence risk for disease subtypes classified by the status of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR). However, it remains unclear whether human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) or p53 expression status further differentiates these exposure-risk group associations. We evaluated the associations of oral contraceptive (OC) use and reproductive factors with incident invasive breast cancer subtypes among 1,197 population-based cases and 2,015 controls from the Los Angeles County or Detroit components of the Women's Contraceptive and Reproductive Experiences Study. Case-control comparisons by ER/PR/HER2/p53 status were conducted by multivariable polychotomous unconditional logistic regression methods. We found that OC use was not associated with any breast cancer subtype as defined by ER/PR/HER2/p53 status, except for a 2.9-fold increased risk of so-called triple-negative tumors (ER-/PR-/HER2(-)) among women of 45 to 64 years of age who started OC use before age 18. Parity was associated with a decreased risk of luminal A (ER+ or PR+, HER2(-)), luminal B (ER+ or PR+/HER2(+)), and ER-/PR-/HER2(+) tumors. Age at first full-term pregnancy was positively associated with luminal A tumors among older women. Neither of these reproductive factors was associated with triple-negative tumors. Long duration of breast-feeding lowered the risk of triple-negative and luminal A tumors. p53 status did not define further differential risk patterns. Our findings offer evidence of differences in the hormone-related risk factors between triple-negative cancers and other ER/PR/HER2-defined subtypes of breast cancer. Cancer Res; 70(2); 575-87. (C)2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available