4.8 Article

Epitome: database of structure-inferred antigenic epitopes

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages D777-D780

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj053

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM064633] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [R01LM007329] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM064633, R01-GM64633-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NLM NIH HHS [R01 LM007329, R01-LM07329-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunoglobulin molecules specifically recognize particular areas on the surface of proteins. These areas are commonly dubbed B-cell epitopes. The identification of epitopes in proteins is important both for the design of experiments and vaccines. Additionally, the interactions between epitopes and antibodies have often served as a model for protein protein interactions. One of the main obstacles in creating a database of antigen-antibody interactions is the difficulty in distinguishing between antigenic and non-antigenic interactions. Antigenic interactions involve specific recognition sites on the antibody's surface, while non-antigenic interactions are between a protein and any other site on the antibody. To solve this problem, we performed a comparative analysis of all protein-antibody complexes for which structures have been experimentally determined. Additionally, we developed a semi-automated tool that identified the antigenic interactions within the known antigen-antibody complex structures. We compiled those interactions into Epitome, a database of structure-inferred antigenic residues in proteins. Epitome consists of all known antigen/antibody complex structures, a detailed description of the residues that are involved in the interactions, and their sequence/structure environments. Interactions can be visualized using an interface to Jmol. The database is available at http://www.rostlab.org/services/epitome/.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available