4.8 Article

Expression of Snail in Epidermal Keratinocytes Promotes Cutaneous Inflammation and Hyperplasia Conducive to Tumor Formation

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 70, Issue 24, Pages 10080-10089

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0324

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH (NIAMS) [5R01AR053185-03]
  2. American Skin Association
  3. Dermatology Foundation
  4. Hellman Faculty
  5. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  6. NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although metastasis is the most lethal consequence of tumor progression, comparatively little is known regarding the molecular machinery governing this process. In many carcinomas, there is a robust correlation between the expression of the transcription factor Snail and a poor prognosis, but the contribution of this protein to the metastatic process remains unresolved. Interestingly, the prolonged expression of Snail in epidermal keratinocytes is sufficient to recapitulate early features of metastasis. However, it does so without inducing a complete epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a developmental phenomenon mediated by Snail that is extensively invoked as the mechanism fueling tumorigenesis. Instead, we found that the local invasiveness of keratinocytes is the consequence of the recruitment and activity of macrophages. Moreover, keratinocyte proliferation is the product of an IL-17/IL-6/Stat3 signaling module initiated by activated resident gamma delta T cells in the transgenic skin. Together, these phenotypes prime the transgenic skin for the formation and metastasis of tumors in response to chemically induced carcinogenesis. Thus, the contribution of Snail to the progression of carcinomas is largely through the creation of a hyperproliferative and inflammatory niche that facilitates tumor development and dissemination. Cancer Res; 70(24); 10080-9. (C) 2010 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available