4.6 Article

Occurrence and genetic diversity of uncultured Legionella spp. in drinking water treated at temperatures below 15 degrees C

Journal

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 157-166

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.157-166.2006

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Representatives of the genus Legionella were detected by use of a real-time PCR method in all water samples collected directly after treatment from 16 surface water (SW) supplies prior to postdisinfection and from 81 groundwater (GW) supplies. Legionella concentrations ranged from 1.1 X 10(3) to 7.8 X 10(5) cells liter(-1) and were significantly higher in SW treated with multiple barriers at 4 degrees C than in GW treated at 9 to 12 degrees C with aeration and filtration but without chemical disinfection. No Legionellae (< 50 CFU liter(-1)) were detected in treated water by the culture method. Legionella was also observed in untreated SW and in untreated aerobic and anaerobic GW. Filtration processes in SW and GW treatment had little effect or increased the Legionella concentration, but ozonation in SW treatment caused about I-log-unit reduction. A phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences of 202 clones, obtained from a selection of samples, showed a high similarity (> 91%) with Legionella sequences in the GenBank database. A total of 40 (33%) of the 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from treated water were identified as described Legionella species and types, including L. bozemanii, L. worsleiensis, Legionella-like amoebal pathogen types, L. quateirensis, L. waltersii, and L. pneumophila. 16S rRNA gene sequences with a similarity of below 97% from described species were positioned all over the phylogenetic tree of Legionella. Hence, a large diversity of yet-uncultured Legionellae are common members of the microbial communities in SW and GW treated at water temperatures of below 15 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available