4.7 Article

High positive predictive value of specific antibodies cross-reacting with a 28-kDa Drosophila antigen for diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 38-42

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei109

Keywords

ankylosing spondylitis; diagnostic test; immunoassay; antibodies

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) can be difficult, and a specific laboratory test has not yet been introduced as a routine diagnostic tool. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic value of antibodies specifically binding to a recombinant 28-kDa antigen for the diagnosis of AS. Methods. Blinded sera were tested for antibodies binding to the procaryotically expressed 28-kDa protein using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This purified 28-kDa protein is produced by a specific clone from an embryonic Drosophila hydei Xgtl I c-DNA library and is bound by human antibodies cross-reacting with both a 36-kDa protein of chromosomes from Drosophila melanogaster and a 69-Da HeLa S3 protein potentially involved in signal transduction pathways. Results. Serum concentrations of antibodies cross-reacting with this specific antigen were increased in 371 patients with AS compared with 37 healthy controls (39.5 vs 22.6 U/ml; P = 0.004). The positive predictive values of this ELISA test for AS were between 95.1% (95% confidence interval 90.6-97.9%) for a cut-off level of 50 U/ml and 97.4% (92.7-99.5%) for a cut-off level of 75 U/ml, and the sensitivities were between 42.1% (37.0-47.3%) for a cut-off level of 50 U/ml and 30.7% (26.1-35.7%) for a cut-off level of 75 U/ml. Conclusions. Serum ELISA tests for antibodies cross-reacting with the 28-kDa antigen show a high positive predictive value for AS of more than 95%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available