4.6 Article

Combinatorial study of tin-transition metal alloys as negative electrodes for lithium-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 153, Issue 10, Pages A1998-A2005

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.2257985

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A survey of the structural and electrochemical properties of combinatorially sputter deposited Sn-transition metal alloys [Sn1-xMx (0 < x < 0.7; M = Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu)] is reported. Over 512 compositions have been studied. Sputtered libraries of Sn1-xMx with M = Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu show no evidence of nanocrystalline or amorphous phases at any composition. By contrast, libraries of Sn1-xMx with M = Ti, V, Cr, and Co show composition ranges where the films are highly nanostructured or amorphous, suggesting that these elemental combinations are better glass formers. The transition metal contents of the amorphous or nanostructured phase regions are 0.37 < x < 0.40 and x > 0.48 to at least x = 0.65 for M = Ti, x > 0.39 to at least x = 0.60 for M = V, 0.47 < x < 0.73 for M = Cr, and 0.28 < x < 0.43 for M = Co. Electrochemical tests using a 64 channel Li/Sn1-xMx combinatorial electrochemical cell show that the specific capacity of the alloys drops with transition metal content, as expected. The Sn1-xCox system shows an amorphous phase with the largest specific capacity, primarily because the amorphous phase is reached at the lowest transition metal content for Sn1-xCox. Capacity retention vs cycle number is generally best for those compositions that are amorphous or highly nanostructured. Arguments are presented to suggest that amorphous Sn1-xVx alloys are the best choice among Sn1-xMx alloys. Comparison with literature results for samples prepared by mechanical alloying, electrodeposition, vacuum deposition, etc. is made. (c) 2006 The Electrochemical Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available