4.5 Article

The reduced expression and aberrant methylation of p16(INK4a) in chromate workers with lung cancer

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 295-302

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.05.022

Keywords

chromium; carcinogenesis; lung cancer; p16 gene; methylation; protein expression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study objectives: It is known that chromium is one of the important inhaled carcinogens that cause lung cancer. Our previous studies revealed a variety of genetic changes in lung cancers from chromate-exposed workers (chromate lung cancer). However, the epigenetic effects of chromium are not understood. Materials and methods: We investigated the methylation of the p16 gene using a methylation-specific PCR method in 30 chromate lung cancers and 38 non-chromate lung cancers, and the expression of the p16 protein using immunohistochemistry in 25 chromate lung cancers. Results: Ten (33%) chromate Lung cancers showed methylation of the p16 promoter region. On the other hand, 10 (26%) of the non-chromate lung cancers also showed it. The frequency of p16 methylation in non-chromate lung cancer was 0%, 33% and 30% for low (<= 600), moderate (<600, >1000) and high (>= 1000) Brinkman indexes, respectively. However, the frequency of p16 methylation in chromate lung cancer was constant, irrespective of the Brinkman index. In chromate lung cancer, patients with chromate exposure of less than 15 years never had p16 methylation, while 40% (>= 25 years) or 43% (>= 15, <25 years) of patients with chromate exposure of more than 15 years did. In chromate lung cancer, chromate exposure, not smoking, mainly influenced the p16 methylation. Most of the chromate lung cancers with p16 methylation (85.7%) showed repression of the p16 protein. Conclusions: We speculate that not only genetic but also epigenetic alterations are involved in the carcinogenesis due to chromium. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available