4.2 Article

Temporal-spatial stability of competition in marine boulder fields

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages 15-23

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps314015

Keywords

hierarchies; encrusting community; latitude; scales

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [bas010008, dml011000] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NERC [bas010008] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Demonstrable examples of marine interference-competition on ecological, and particularly evolutionary, time-scales have been highly confined in space. However, studies of such competition across large-scale space are conversely mere 'snapshots' in time. The current study aimed at measuring interference-competition at multiple scales in space and time. Different aspects of interference-competition were measured in a model community (encrusters of boulder communities, e.g. ascidians, bryozoans, polychaetes and sponges) at 3 tropical, 3 temperate and 2 polar sites at intervals of days, weeks, months and years. The 3 aspects of competition measured-transitivity (hierarchicalness), number of clades involved, prevalence of interspecific encounters-varied non-significantly with time (from days to years) but significantly in space (from the tropics to the poles). Thus the strong differences observed in space are robust along ecological time-scales; boulder communities may be highly dynamic at local scales, but overall measures of interference-competition amongst their encrusters seem to vary little within a region. Why low- and high-latitude encrusting communities should differ may be linked to past selection pressures-to survive spatial competition in the more stable warm seas and to be able to recolonise from local ice-scour and regional ice sheets in the high temperate and polar realms. The results of the current study suggest that, despite being 'snapshots', the many point-in-time studies of competition in the literature are likely to be valid on ecological time-scales and thus useful for meta-analyses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available