4.3 Article

Characterisation of two distinctly different processes associated with the electrocrystallization of microcrystals of phase I CuTCNQ (TCNQ=7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
Volume 16, Issue 45, Pages 4397-4406

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b607290a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Semi-conducting phase I CuTCNQ (TCNQ = 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane), which is of considerable interest as a switching device for memory storage materials, can be electrocrystallized from CH(3)CN via two distinctly different pathways when TCNQ is reduced to TCNQ(center dot-) in the presence of [Cu(MeCN)(4)](+). The first pathway, identified in earlier studies, occurs at potentials where TCNQ is reduced to TCNQ(center dot-) and involves a nucleation-growth mechanism at preferred sites on the electrode to produce arrays of well separated large branched needle-shaped phase I CuTCNQ crystals. The second pathway, now identified at more negative potentials, generates much smaller needle-shaped phase I CuTCNQ crystals. These electrocrystallize on parts of the surface not occupied in the initial process and give rise to film-like characteristics. This process is attributed to the reduction of Cu(+)[(TCNQ(center dot-))(TCNQ)] or a stabilised film of TCNQ via a solid solid conversion process, which also involves ingress of Cu(+) via a nucleation- growth mechanism. The CuTCNQ surface area coverage is extensive since it occurs at all areas of the electrode and not just at defect sites that dominate the crystal formation sites for the first pathway. Infrared spectra, X-ray diffraction, surface plasmon resonance, quartz crystal microbalance, scanning electron microscopy and optical image data all confirm that two distinctly different pathways are available to produce the kinetically-favoured and more highly conducting phase I CuTCNQ solid, rather than the phase II material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available