4.4 Article

Frames of reference for saccadic command tested by saccade collision in the supplementary eye field

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 159-170

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00268.2005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [EY-05879] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In what frame of reference does the supplementary eye field (SEF) encode saccadic eye movements? In this study, the saccade collision test was used to determine whether a saccade electrically evoked in the monkey's SEF is programmed to reach an oculocentric goal or a nonoculocentric (e.g., head or body-centered) goal. If the eyes start moving just before or when an oculocentric goal is imposed by electrical stimulation, the trajectory of the saccade to that goal should compensate for the ongoing movement. Conversely, if the goal imposed by electrical stimulation is nonoculocentric, the trajectory of the evoked saccade should not be altered. In head-fixed experiments, we mapped the trajectories of evoked saccades while the monkey fixated at each of 25 positions 10 degrees apart in a 40 x 40 degrees grid. For each studied SEF site, we calculated convergences indices and found that convergent and nonconvergent sites were separately clustered: nonconvergent rostral to convergent. Then, the saccade collision test was systematically applied. We found compensation at sites where saccades were of the nonconvergent type and practically no compensation at sites where saccades were of the convergent type. The results indicate that the SEF can encode saccade goals in at least two frames of reference and suggest a rostrocaudal segregation in the representation of these two modes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available