4.3 Article

Angiopoietin-1 and-2 mRNA and protein expression in mouse preimplantation embryos and uteri suggests a role in angiogenesis during implantation

Journal

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages 509-516

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD05110

Keywords

embryo development; reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; uterus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After attachment and migration through the endometrial epithelium, the embryo must induce angiogenesis within the endometrial stroma to successfully complete the implantation process. Growth factors have been shown to play an important role in embryo implantation and placentation. The aim of the study was to investigate the expression of angiopoietin-1 and -2 (Ang-1 and -2) mRNA and protein expression during the development of single preimplantation mouse embryos and of possible complementary expression in mouse uteri. Angiopoietin-1 mRNA was expressed throughout development in 78% of zygotes, 66% of 2-cell-embryos, 71% of 4-cell-embryos, 70% of 8-cell-embryos, 60% of morula stages, 48% of early blastocysts and 78% of late blastocysts. The number of Ang-1-expressing embryos in the early-blastocyst group was significantly different in comparison with zygotes, 4-cellembryos, 8-cell-embryos and late blastocysts. Angiopoietin-2 mRNA and protein expression could not be detected in preimplantation embryos. Examination of the uteri revealed Ang-2 mRNA and protein expression in the oestrogen-dominated cycling phase and the progesterone-dominated mated phase, whereas Ang-1 expression was restricted to the mated phase. Herein, Ang-1 expression in preimplantation mouse embryos as well as Ang-1 and -2 expression in mouse uteri is demonstrated, suggesting a possible role for angiopoietins in the embryo-maternal dialogue of the implantation process via an enhancement of the vascular remodelling in favour of an implanting conceptus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available